Proses Pemecahan Masalah Aritmetika Siswa Disabilitas
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This article aims to describe the process of solving arithmetic problems for students with disabilities. The research method used in this study is the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The SLR method is used to identify, review, evaluate, and interpret all available research with topic areas of interest. Data collection is done by documenting and reviewing all articles related to solving arithmetic problems. The articles used were 5 articles. The results showed that the process of solving arithmetic problems for students with disabilities was different. Students with disabilities experience many obstacles in solving arithmetic problems, especially in counting numbers from 10 to 100. Students with disabilities have difficulty understanding language. At other times, students with disabilities use procedures, strategies, and the desire to be active in the learning process. It is recommended for further researchers to develop special tools for students with disabilities.
Rincian Artikel
Terbitan
Bagian
Referensi
Björklund, C., Marton, F., & Kullberg, A. (2021). What is to be learnt? Critical aspects of elementary arithmetic skills. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10045-0
Desoete, A., & Warreyn, P. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue: Mathematical abilities in developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107(November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103805
Dowker, A. (2020). Arithmetic in developmental cognitive disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107(October), 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103778
Hobri, Susanto, H. A., Hidayati, A., Susanto, & Warli. (2021). Exploring Thinking Process of Students with Mathematics Learning Disability in Solving Arithmetic Problems To cite this article : Exploring Thinking Process of Students with Mathematics Learning Disability in Solving Arithmetic Problems. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(3), 498–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1684
Huijsmans, M. D. E., Kleemans, T., van der Ven, S. H. G., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). The relevance of subtyping children with mathematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704
Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., Deaño, M., Alfonso, S., & Conde, Ã. (2017). Mathematical learning disabilities and attention deficit and/or hyperactivity disorder: A study of the cognitive processes involved in arithmetic problem solving. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 61, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.012
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., van Boven, S., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2021). Building on student mathematical thinking in whole-class discourse: exploring teachers’ in-the-moment decision-making, interpretation, and underlying conceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09499-z
Kullberg, A., & Björklund, C. (2020). Preschoolers’ different ways of structuring part-part-whole relations with finger patterns when solving an arithmetic task. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(4), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01119-8
Persky, A. M., Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2019). Developing critical thinking skills in pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7033
Rasiman. (2019). Leveling of critical thinking abilities of students of mathematics education in mathematical problem solving. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1941.40-52
Roos, H. (2019). Inclusion in mathematics education : an ideology , a way of teaching , or both ? 25–41.
Ross, W., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Van Herwegen, J. (2020). Mental Arithmetic and Interactivity: the Effect of Manipulating External Number Representations on Older Children’s Mental Arithmetic Success. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09978-z
Santegoeds, E., van der Schoot, E., Roording-Ragetlie, S., Klip, H., & Rommelse, N. (2022). Neurocognitive functioning of children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and psychiatric disorders: profile characteristics and predictors of behavioural problems. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 66(1–2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12874
Sermier Dessemontet, R., Moser Opitz, E., & Schnepel, S. (2020). The Profiles and Patterns of Progress in Numerical Skills of Elementary School Students with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1608915
Soltani, A., & Mirhosseini, S. (2019). The Contribution of General Cognitive Abilities and Specific Number Skills toward Arithmetic Performance in Students with Mild Intellectual Disability The Contribution of General Cognitive Abilities and Speci fi c Number Skills toward Arithmetic Performan. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1619673