STRATEGI NAFKAH RUMAH TANGGA PETANI KOPI DI DESA KENDENAN KECAMATAN BARAKA KABUPATEN ENREKANG

Main Article Content

Rifki Aditya Saputra
Amruddin Amruddin
Nadir Nadir

Abstract

This study aims to determine the form of farmer household income strategies and household income capital in Kendena Village, Baraka District, Enrekang Regency in dealing with vulnerability. The research was carried out from November to December 2020 which was located in Kendenan Village, Baraka District, Enrekang Regency. Determination of informants is done by purposive sampling method or deliberately by taking 10%. The data collected in this study consisted of two types, namely primary data and secondary data. The results of the study show that the livelihood strategies used by farmers in Kendenan Village are of the same type of work and some are not the same type of work, and have different priorities. The classification of livelihood strategies in Kendenan Village includes 1.) Engineering of agricultural livelihoods is carried out by intensifying and extensifying agriculture. The strategy of expanding agricultural land (extensification) in Polo Slope Village is still possible for lowland rice farmers because the available land is still large. 2.) Double income pattern. The dual role of livelihood carried out by farming households, husband and wife each work in the same sector, husband and wife work but in different sectors, one member of the household has more than one type of work, each family member chooses another job , usually increase household income to survive. 3.) Spatial engineering is an effort carried out by mobilizing/moving residents both permanently and circularly (migration) in order to seek livelihood sources elsewhere. Farmers who migrate circularly in Kendenan Village, commute every day to earn a living outside the village so they can increase their income to meet their family's living needs.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Cutter SL et al., 2003. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association 84(2): 242-259

Dharmawan AH., 2001. Farm Household Livelihood Strategies and Soci-economic Changes in Rural Indonesia. [Disertasi]. Germany: The Georg-August University of Gottingen.

Ellis F., 2000. Rural Livelihood and Diversity in Developing Countries. London (UK): Oxford University Press.

Fussel H. Martin., 2007. Vulnerability: A Generally Applicable Conceptual Framework for Climate Change Research. Global Environment Change, 17: 155 -167.

Niswah ZK., 2011. Strategi nafkah masyarakat adat kasepuhan sinar resmi di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. [Skripsi]. Bogor [ID]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Rahardjo P., 2012. Panduan Budidaya dan Pengolahan Kopi Arabika dan Robusta. Jakarta: Penerbar Swadaya

Saragih S. Lassa J., & Ramli A., 2007. Kerangka penghidupan berkelanjutan (Sustainablelivelihood framework). Retrieved from http://www.zef.de/module/register/media/2390_SL-Chapter1.pdf

Scoones I., 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods a Framework for Analysis. Analysis, 72: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110037

Subali Agus., 2005. Pengaruh Konversi Lahan Terhadap Pola Nafkah Rumah Tangga Petani: Studi Kasus Desa Batu Jajar Kecamatan Cigudeg Kabupaten Bogor (Skripsi). Fakultas Pertanian Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor

White B., 1978. Rumah tangga sebagai unit analisa. Makalah disampaikan pada Lokakarya Studi Dinamika Pedesaan Jawa Timur. Survei Agro Ekonomi – Universitas Brawijaya pada bulan Maret, 1978.

Wolf E.,1983. Petani suatu Tinjauan Antropologi. Jakarta: CV Rajawali