Keywords
Choice Rider
Pull Strategy
Theory of Planned Behaviour
PLS-SEM
Abstract
The higher practice of private car use in DKI Jakarta amid the implementation of the TDM strategy that continues to be developed leads to increased traffic congestion, which in turn causes economic losses, deteriorated air quality, and an increase in acute respiratory tract infection cases. Innovation is needed in the pull strategy of DKI Jakarta residents to suppress this behavior, especially those who have (access to) private vehicles to switch to public transportation. This study tries to analyze the effect of gamification on the behavioral intentions of DKI Jakarta residents (choice users) to use public transit for their daily activities (school/college/work). Modifications to the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) were carried out to investigate the influence of gamification through attitudes and behavioral control on behavioral intentions to use public transportation. The theory was tested using questionnaire data from 200 respondents with SEM-PLS analysis. The elements of points, levels, rewards, and games are used as indicators of gamification. This study shows that gamification positively and significantly affects attitudes and behavioral control. The study findings confirm the significant positive influence of attitudes on behavioral intentions to use public transportation. The results of this research can also be used as material for consideration in pull strategy (TDM) policy innovation in DKI Jakarta.References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ali, N., Nakayama, S., & Yamaguchi, H. (2023). Using the extensions of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) for behavioral intentions to use public transport (PT) in Kanazawa, Japan. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 17(November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100742
Bandyopadhyaya, V., & Bandyopadhyaya, R. (2022). Understanding public transport use intention post-COVID-19 outbreak using the modified theory of planned behavior: A case study from a developing country perspective. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2044–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.002
Castellanos, S. (2016). Delivering modal-shift incentives by using gamification and smartphones: A field study example in Bogota, Colombia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.08.008
Che, T., Peng, Y., Zhou, Q., Dickey, A., & Lai, F. (2023). The impacts of gamification designs on consumer purchase: A use and gratification theory perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 59(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101268
Deterding, S., O’Hara, K., Sicart, M., Dixon, D., & Nacke, L. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, May 2425–2428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
Dinh Toan, T., Hoi Lam, S., Meng, M., & Diew Wong, Y. (2023). Travel demand management policies: A case study of Singapore and transferability potentials for Hanoi. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11(October 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.100934
Dirgahayani, P., & Sutanto, H. (2020). The effect of transport demand management policy on the intention to use public transport: A case in Bandung, Indonesia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.03.004
Donald, I. J., Cooper, S. R., & Conchie, S. M. (2014). An extended theory of planned behavior model of the psychological factors affecting commuters' transport mode use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.003
Guerra, E. (2022). What the heck is a choice rider? A theoretical framework and empirical model. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 15(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.2096
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2011). " Gamification " from the perspective of service marketing " Gamification " from the perspective of service marketing. CHI 2011 Workshop “Gamification,†January 2011, 11–15.
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0212-z
Ishikawa, T., Dirgahayanib, P., & Fujiwarac, A. (2019). Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Implementing Mobility Management atInadequately Mass Transit Developed Area-A Case of Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 13, 1853–1872.
Jacques, C., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). Rescuing the captive [mode] user: An alternative approach to transport market segmentation. Transportation, 40(3), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9437-2
Kaur, J., Lavuri, R., Parida, R., & Singh, S. V. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Gamification Elements in Brand Apps on the Purchase Intention of Consumers. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.317216
Keizer, M., Sargisson, R. J., van Zomeren, M., & Steg, L. (2019). When personal norms predict the acceptability of push and pull car-reduction policies: Testing the ABC model and low-cost hypothesis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.06.005
Koo, Y., Lee, M., & Cho, Y. (2013). A point card system for public transport utilization in Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 22, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.007
Krizek, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2007). Segmenting Preferences and Habits of Transit Users and Non-Users. Journal of Public Transportation, 10(3), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.5
Lachowicz, M. J., Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2018). A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000165
Litman, T. (2008). Mobility management: innovative management strategies to transport problems. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Matubatuba, R., & De Meyer-Heydenrych, C. F. (2022). Developing an intention to use amongst non-users of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: An emerging market perspective. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 45(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100858
Ogbeibu, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gaskin, J., Senadjki, A., & Hughes, M. (2021). Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organizational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2421–2440. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2754
Shahisa, A., & Aprilianty, F. (2022). The Effect of Gojek’s Gamification Strategy (GoClub) Towards Customer Loyalty. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 4(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajrbm.2022.4.3.20
Sohn, K., & Yun, J. (2009). Separation of car-dependent commuters from normal-choice riders in mode-choice analysis. Transportation, 36(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9209-9
Tsirimpa, A., Polydoropoulou, A., Pagoni, I., & Tsouros, I. (2019). A reward-based instrument for promoting multimodality. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, pp. 65, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.002
Tumlin, J. (2012). Sustainable Transportation Planning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. 241
Wang, S., Wang, J., & Yang, F. (2020). From willingness to action: Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79(96). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242
Yen, B. T. H., Mulley, C., & Meza, G. (2023a). Exploring the attitudes and perceptions influencing user participation in gamification schemes for TDM. Research in Transportation Economics, 99, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101300
Yen, B. T. H., Mulley, C., & Meza, G. (2023b). Understanding the potential policy transfer of gamification schemes for behavior change in public transport and road safety. Research in Transportation Economics, 99(8 May 2023), 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101299
Zhao, P., & Gao, Y. (2022). Public transit travel choice in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era: An application of the extended Theory of Planned behavior. Travel Behaviour and Society, 28(April), pp. 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.002
Authors who publish in PENA TEKNIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Teknik agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.