Please read and understand the author's guidelines for the preparation manuscript. The author who submits a manuscript to the editors should comply with the author's guidelines and template. If the submitted manuscript does not comply with the guidelines or using a different format, it will be rejected by the editorial team before being reviewed. The editorial team will only accept a manuscript that meets the specified formatting requirements (downloadable at: Template and Author Guidelines). This template is designed to assist Author in preparing manuscript; it is an exact representation of the format expected by the editor. To use this template, please just Save As this MS Word file to your document, then copy and paste your document here. All papers submitted to the journal should be written in English language.

 

PAPER FORMAT

The word limit for the submission is 4000-8000 words (excluding of abstract and references).
The sequence of manuscripts following: Title; Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Method (for original research articles); Main Heading Analysis; Conclusion; and References.
Referencing style uses the American Psychological Association

Title

Title of articles are written with Times New Roman (17 pt) and preferably not more than 17 words. Author(s) name, affiliations and e-mail.

Abstract
The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of paper, followed by a statement regarding the method and a brief summary of results. Font with Times New Roman (10 pt) and preferably not more than 250 words.

Keywords
Keywords arranged by alphabetically and should have at least two keywords and maximum five keywords separated by a semicolon (;).

Introduction
The introduction should be clear and provide the issue to be discussed in the manuscript. At the end of the paragraph, the author/s should end with a comment on the significance concerning identification of the issue and the objective of research.

Method
The method written in descriptive. This Method are optional, only for original research articles.

Analysis and Discussion
This section is the most important section of your article. Contains the results of the object of study and should be clear and concise. The discussion section of a journal paper is a crucial component where the author analyzes and interprets the research results, discusses their relevance in the context of existing literature, and explains the theoretical and practical implications of the findings. In this section, the author should relate the results back to the hypotheses or research questions posed at the beginning, explain any confirmations or deviations from the expected results, and discuss potential reasons for the findings. Effectively, the discussion section aims to show how the results of the study contribute to existing knowledge, offer new insights, or challenge existing assumptions within that field of study.

Conclusion
Conclusion contains a description that should answer the objectives of research. Do not repeat the Abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.

References
PENA TEKNIK uses the APA (American Psychological Association) in the References at the end of the manuscript. Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc. Use other published articles in the same journal as models. All publications cited in the text should be included in the References section and arranged alphabetically.

The citation quick guide can be found at: https://apastyle.apa.org/

Maximum number of references is 120

BOOK REVIEW GUIDELINES

PENA TEKNIK does not require any rigid format for conducting a book review. Reviewers should feel at liberty to approach the review in their own style with the broader aim of contextualizing the work in the literature or policy developments at the time of publication. We welcome reviews about academic books, monographs or edited volumes, policy publications, or reviews on past works that are relevant for re-engaging in theory, policy, and practice related to contemporary issues in legal scholarship.

The remainder of this document sets out some guidelines for potential book reviewers to follow in conducting a review. Word count: We prefer formats between 1500-2000 words. The review should also seek out to cover the questions listed below:

How is the author’s background and work situated in the broader field of study?
What is the central argument of the book and how is the work timely in its theoretical or empirical engagement? Does it deliver and does it leave anything out?
What was the methodology and factual basis of the study? Were there factual errors and oversights or faulty assumptions? We are especially interested in a close review of the sources, extent, and depth of the research.
Who is the audience of the book?
How is the structure, prose, length, and other aspects of the books accessibility and readability? Is it enjoyable?
Are there unique features to the book in terms of illustrations, indexing, bibliographic or other aspects?
Does the title capture the book’s major argument?
If you would like to follow a general outline, we propose approaching the review under the following headings / sub-sections:

Introduction: brief description of the subject, aim, and scope. Make sure to outline the central thesis of the book and the key arguments
Situate within the broader literature both theoretically and empirically. Has this book filled a key gap and how?
Review the components of the arguments and review the strengths and weaknesses of each of the arguments. Are there key features of the book that were particularly memorable?
What new questions does the book raise?

Guideline for Online Submission
Author should first register as Author and/or is offered as Reviewer through the following address: https://ojs.unanda.ac.id/index.php/jiit/user/register

Author should fulfil the form as detail as possible where the star marked form must be entered. After all form textbox was filled, Author clicks on “Register” button to proceed the registration. Therefore, Author is brought to online author submission interface where Author should click on “New Submission”. In the Start a New Submission section, click on “’Click Here’: to go to step one of the five-step submission process”. The following are five steps in online submission process:

Step 1 - Starting the Submission: Select the appropriate section of journal, i.e. Original Research Articles or Review Article. Thus, author must check-mark on the submission checklists.
Step 2 – Uploading the Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click Browse on the Upload submission file item and choose the manuscript document file to be submitted, then click Upload button.
Step 3 – Entering Submission’s Metadata: In this step, detail authors metadata should be entered including marked corresponding author. After that, manuscript title and abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and paste in the textbox including keywords.
Step 4 – Uploading Supplementary Files: Supplementary file should be uploaded including Covering/Submission Letter, the proofread evidence, and Signed Copyright Transfer Agreement Form. Therefore, click on Browse button, choose the files, and then click on Upload button.
Step 5 – Confirming the Submission: Author should final check the uploaded manuscript documents in this step. To submit the manuscript to PENA TEKNIK journal, click Finish Submission button after the documents is true. The corresponding author or the principal contact will receive an acknowledgement by email and will be able to view the submission’s progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web address site.
After this submission, Authors who submit the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. In some cases, the confirmation email may end up in your spam box. Please check your spam box if you do not find the confirmation email in your inbox. Authors are able to track their submission status at any time by logging in to the online submission interface. The submission tracking includes the status of manuscript review and editorial process.

Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor). It is up to the editorial board to decide upon acceptance.
The submission file is in OpenOffice or Microsoft Word file format.
The submission article has been in accordance with PENA TEKNIK's Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal. For reference, our reference uses APA (American Psychological Association). The citation quick guide can be found at: https://apastyle.apa.org/

Any third-party-owned materials used have been identified with appropriate credit lines, and permission obtained from the copyright holder for all formats of the journal.
The author declares the absence of any conflict of interest in this work.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

If English is not your first language, and your paper is written in English, we appreciate it if your manuscript has passed the proofread process by a native or a trusted proofread institution. Do not forget to attach the proofread evidence to the supplementary file when making a submission. Otherwise, your manuscript will be checked for grammar, if deemed to require significant improvement, your paper will be delayed or even rejected after review by the editorial team.

Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

PENA TEKNIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license allows other users to distribute, modify, adapt, and rebuild the licensed work, even for commercial purposes, as long as they give credit to the original creator in the manner specified by the creator or licensor. In addition, all new works created based on that work must be licensed under the same terms, i.e. “ShareAlike.” This creates a cycle where all derivative works will carry the same license, thus preserving the freedom for any works created from the original work. This license is often used in contexts that value and promote open access and creative collaboration.

Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.