Abstrak
In seismic design, reinforced concrete structures must perform well under heavy load conditions. To withstand large lateral loads without severe damage, structures require strength and energy dissipation capacity. It is generally not economical to design reinforced concrete structures to the greatest possible ground motions without damage. Therefore, the need for ductility must be weighed against economic constraints. This research is focused on dry joints where the joints are on beams in the plastic hinge area and modeled using steel plates, this modeling will be compared with the hysteresis and ductility curves in three types of specimens namely BU-1 without using plate joints, BU-2 using plate joints measuring 300mm x 400mm, BU-3 plate joints measuring 200mm x 400mm, with the same thickness and quality, namely 8mm thick and Fu 370 MPa. To strengthen the use of the plate connection, A325 bolts with a diameter of 12 mm and Fu 620 MPa are used. The results show that the pinching effect is found in the hysteresis curve of the BU-2 and BU-3 specimens. Meanwhile, for the ductility test at peak load, namely the seventh ductility for BU-1, the value is still better than BU-2 and BU-3. These results can still be improved with several variations of plate thickness, for this reason, further studies are recommended to develop and increase recommendations for several variations of plate joints, because precast joints, especially dry joints, are still the focus of research, especially in Indonesia.Referensi
ACI-ASCE Committee 352. (1976). Recommendations for design of beam-column joints in monolithic reinforced concrete structures. ACI journal, 375.
ACI Committee 374. (2005). Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary: An ACI Standard. American Concrete Institute.
Ahmad, N., Rizwan, M., Ilyas, B., Hussain, S., Khan, M. U., Shakeel, H., & Ahmad, M. E. (2022). Nonlinear Modeling of RC Substandard Beam–Column Joints for Building Response Analysis in Support of Seismic Risk Assessment and Loss Estimation. Buildings, 12(10), 1758.
Aycardi, L. E., Mander, J. B., & Reinhorn, A. M. (1994). Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: experimental performance of subassemblages. Structural Journal, 91(5), 552-563
Azevedo, J., & Calado, L. (1994). Hysteretic behaviour of steel members: analytical models and experimental tests. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 29(1-3), 71-94.
Bracci, J. M., Reinhorn, A. M., & Mander, J. B. (1995). Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system. Structural Journal, 92(5), 597-609.
Budziński, R., & Ślęczka, L. (2020). Behaviour of steel sheeting connections with self-drilling screws under variable loading. Open Engineering, 10(1), 527-535.
Cheng, W. P., Wang, L. C., Song, Y. P., & Wang, J. (2015). Seismic behaviour of beam-column joints of precast and partial steel reinforced concrete. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 22(2), 108-117.
Council, B. S. S. (2009). NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Rep. FEMA P, 750.
Dessouki, A. K., Youssef, A. H., & Ibrahim, M. M. (2013). Behavior of I-beam bolted extended end-plate moment connections, Ain Shams Eng. J, 4(4), 685-699.
Ellingwood, B. R., Smilowitz, R., Dusenberry, D. O., Duthinh, D., Lew, H. S., & Carino, N. J. (2007). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings.
Elliott, K. S. (2019). Precast concrete structures. Crc Press.
European Convention for Constructional Steelwork. Technical Committee 1, Structural Safety, Loadings. Technical Working Group, & Seismic Design. (1986). Recommended testing procedure for assessing the behaviour of structural steel elements under cyclic loads. ECCS.
FEMA 356, F. E. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, USA.
Fernandes, C., Melo, J., Varum, H., & Costa, A. (2013). Cyclic Behavior of Substandard Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints with Plain Bars. ACI Structural Journal, 110(1).
Hanson, N. W., & Connor, H. W. (1967). Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Journal of the structural Division, 93(5), 533-560.
Hasan, S. A. (2011). Behaviour of discontinuous precast concrete beam-column connections (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
Hashim, N., & Agarwal, J. (2018, April). Rotational stiffness of precast beam-column connection using finite element method. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 140, No. 1, p. 012128). IOP Publishing.
Hawkins, N. M., & Ghosh, S. K. (2000). Proposed Revisions to 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for Precast Concrete Structures Part 3- Diaphragms. PCI journal, 45(6), 50-58.
Kassem, M. M., Nazri, F. M., Farsangi, E. N., & Ozturk, B. (2022). Improved vulnerability index methodology to quantify seismic risk and loss assessment in reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(12), 6172-6207.
Kim, J., & LaFave, J. M. (2008). Probabilistic joint shear strength models for design of RC beam-column connections. ACI Structural Journal, 105(6), 770.
KR, S. C., & GS, T. (2012). Comparative Study on Behaviour of Reinforced Beam-Column Joints with Reference to Anchorage Detailing.
Lin, C. M., & Restrepo, J. I. (2002). Seismic behaviour and design of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 35(2), 108-128.
Lu, X., Urukap, T. H., Li, S., & Lin, F. (2012). Seismic behavior of interior RC beam-column joints with additional bars under cyclic loading. Earthquake and Structures, 3(1), 37-57.
Melo, J., Varum, H., & Rossetto, T. (2022). Experimental assessment of the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of exterior RC beam-column joints built with plain bars and non-seismically designed. Engineering Structures, 270, 114887.
Moehle, J. P., & Mahin, S. A. (1991). Observations on the behavior of reinforced concrete buildings during earthquakes. Special Publication, 127, 67-90.
Mohamadi-Shoore, M. R., Ghafari, H., & Amankhani, M. (2013). Finite Element Modeling of RHS Splice Beam Bolted Connections. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 6(3).
Park, R. (1995). A perspective on the seismic design of precast concrete structures in New Zealand. PCI journal, 40(3).
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1973, June). Behaviour of reinforced concrete external beam-column joints under cyclic loading. In Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome (Vol. 1, pp. 772-781).
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1991). Reinforced concrete structures. John Wiley & Sons.
Paulay, T., Park, R., & Preistley, M. J. N. (1978, November). Reinforced concrete beam-column joints under seismic actions. In Journal Proceedings (Vol. 75, No. 11, pp. 585-593).
Priestley, M. J. N. (1997). Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of earthquake engineering, 1(01), 157-192.
Ravikumar, S., & Kothandaraman, S. (2022). Experimental study on performance of ductile and non-ductile reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joint. International Journal of Engineering, 35(7), 1237-1245.
Shariatmadar, H., & ZAMANI, B. E. (2014). An investigation of seismic response of precast concrete beam to column connections: experimental study.
Van-Long, H., Jean-François, D., & Jean-Pierre, J. (2013). Proposal of a simplified analytical approach for the characterisation of the end-plate component in circular tube connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 90, 245-252.
Wahjudi, D. I., Suprobo, P., & Sugihardjo, H. (2014). Behavior of precast concrete beam-to-column connection with U-and L-bent bar anchorages placed outside the column panel–experimental study. Procedia Engineering, 95, 122-131.
Yu, J., & Tan, K. H. (2014). Special detailing techniques to improve structural resistance against progressive collapse. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(3), 04013077.
ZHISHENG, L. (2013). Designing Moment-resisting Connection for Disassembly for Implementation in Precast Reinforced Concrete Buildings.
Authors who publish in PENA TEKNIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Teknik agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
