ANALYSIS THE ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT CAPACITY BASED ECOSYSTEM SERVICES TO BASIC DIRECTIONS FOR ADJUSTING THE SPACE PATTERN IN WACO REGENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55285/bonita.v4i2.1630Keywords:
Analysis Hierarcy Process, completion, spatial patternAbstract
Wajo Regency ecosystem has an abundance of natural and ecological resources with great potential. However, the rapid pace of development activities followed by rapid land conversion has put the sustainability of the supporting ecosystems under pressure. Therefore, it is necessary to map the carrying capacity of the environment based on ecosystem services in Wajo Regency in order to identify the fit between environmental carrying capacity and development in Wajo Regency. Research is at Wajo Regency, through the identification of land cover. ecosystem service-based land capability based analysis is conducted using an Analysis Hierarchy Process to determine the value of ecosystem services from four classes of environmental services, namely water supply, food supply, natural disaster prevention and runoff, and flood management. Instructions for completing spatial patterns in Wajo Regency are performed by analyzing the overlap of the ecosystem service-based bearing capacity map with the Wajo Regency spatial pattern map to obtain a class of spatial pattern alignment. The orientation class is based on the carrying capacity of the land capability based based on ecosystem services to optimize land cover in Wajo Regency. Results of this study show that the land capability based of the four examined ecosystem services in Wajo Regency is dominated by high and low classes. The results of the evaluation of the RTRW by Wajo Regency show that an area of 42,048.97 ha corresponds to the carrying capacity based on ecosystem services. An area of 199,454.11 hectares of land is less oriented, but most of it is retained based on the direction of the spatial pattern. In terms of environmental sustainability based on ecosystem services, the most important land accesses are in the designated settlement areas, other protected areas and local protected areas.
References
Handayani L D., Trisasongko B H., Tjahjono B. 2015. Geomorphology Analysis Of Lava Flow Of Mt. Guntur In West Java Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) With Fully Polarimetry. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 24 : 303– 307.
Hidajat Janthy Trilusianthy Hidajat, Santun R.P Sitorus, Ernan Rustiadi, and Machfud., 2013. Detection of Urban Expansion in Urban Fringe of Jakarta Metropolitan Area Using Landsat TM Image. Proceeding 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing Bali. 20-24 Oktober: (SC04) 566-571.
MEA Millenium Ecosystem Assesment. 2005. Ecosystem and Human Well- Being. Washington (USA): World Resources Institute.
Muhardi R., Tjahjono B., Baskoro, D.P.T. 2014. Penilaian Bahaya Lahar Gunung Salak (Suatu Pendekatan Morfometri). Jurnal Lingkungan dan Bencana Geologi. 5(2) : 93 – 110.
Permen LHK Nomor P.52/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/6/2016 tentang Norma, Standar, Prosedur dan Kriteria Pengendalian Pembangunan Ekoregion Pada Pusat Pengendalian Pembangunan Ekoregion.
Pusat Pengendalian Pembangunan Ekoregion Kalimantan, 2016. Daya Dukung Dan Daya Tampung Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan Hidup Ekoregion Kalimantan Berbasis Jasa Ekosistem. Balikpapan: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan.
Saaty TL. 1991. Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hierarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks [terjemahan]. Jakarta (ID): PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
Smith MJ dan Clark CD. 2005. Methods for the visualization of digital elevation models for landform mapping. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 30 : 885–900.
SNI 7645-1:2014 tentang klasifikasi tutupan lahan.
Tammy I., Mustajavri K., Rasinmika J. 2017. Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional.
UU No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Verstappen HTh dan van Zuidam RA. 1975. ITC-system of Geomorphological Survey. Enschede : International Insitute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences.
